Welcome to Book Bites, where we give you big ideas in small bites. Today we're getting into Emily Nagoski's Come As You Are, the surprising new science that will transform your sex life. Yeah, this one came out in 2015, and it's made quite a splash.
You see it mentioned a lot in self-help, feminism, psychology circles. Definitely. It's got, what, over 75,000 ratings on Goodreads? And a pretty high average, like 4.29 stars.
So clearly it's hitting home for a lot of people. I think what grabs people is the promise, right? It's about using science, actual research, to understand your own sexuality better. Less about rules, more about understanding yourself, which honestly sounds pretty transformative.
Exactly. And she kicks off with this really foundational idea that, biologically speaking, we're all kind of made of the same parts. Just organized differently.
Yeah, precisely. It's not just about, you know, genitals, though that's part of it. It extends to how our brains and nervous systems handle sexual response, too.
Okay, let's dig into that same parts idea first, the anatomy bit. Sure. So, Nagoski points out that structures like the clitoris and the penis actually develop from the exact same embryonic tissues.
Right. So the variation we see in genitals is, well, it's just natural variation. Right.
Like height or hair color. Exactly. And understanding that helps normalize things like intersex conditions, too.
They're not aberrations, they're part of the natural spectrum. That feels like a really important starting point. Yeah.
Takes away some of the pressure and weirdness society puts on bodies. Totally. And then she applies that same principle, same parts, different organization, to how our sexual response system works.
This is where the accelerator and brakes come in. That's it. The dual control model, you've got the sexual excitation system, the SES, that's your gas pedal.
Your accelerator. Makes sense. And then you have the sexual inhibition system, the SIS, that's your brakes.
Okay, so arousal isn't just hitting the gas. Nope. It's a balance.
It depends on how much gas you're getting and how much you're hitting the brakes. Or, maybe more importantly, how much you're not hitting the brakes. And we all differ in how sensitive these are.
Hugely. Some people have a really sensitive accelerator. They get turned on pretty easily.
Others might have really sensitive brakes. Right. Things like stress, anxiety, distractions.
They can slam on the brakes much more easily for some people. And I guess some people might have a less sensitive accelerator, needing more stimulation. Exactly.
Or less sensitive brakes, so they're not as easily thrown off course. The point is, everyone's combination is unique. Understanding your own settings, so to speak.
That's the key. Knowing if you're naturally more accelerator sensitive or brake sensitive helps you figure out what you need to get aroused and stay aroused. It really changes how you think about turn-ons and turn-offs, doesn't it? It becomes so much more individual.
And context dependent, which is another huge theme in the book. Right. Context is everything.
What does she mean by context exactly? Well, it's both external stuff and internal stuff. Okay. Like external, the setting, your partner, safety.
Yeah. All that. Environment, relationship dynamics, whether something feels new or familiar, feeling safe and secure.
And internal. That's your mood, stress levels, how much trust you feel, feelings of love or connection, your overall emotional state. These interact constantly.
Absolutely. A safe, romantic setting, external context might help you feel relaxed and trusting internal context, which then makes it easier for your accelerator to work and your brakes to ease off. So creating the right context is crucial for good sexual experiences.
It really is. You need to know what conditions help your specific system thrive. This connects to something else she discusses.
Arousal non-concordance. Ah, yes. Super important concept.
That's the mismatch between what your body is doing physically, like lubrication or erection, and what you're feeling subjectively. So your body might look aroused, but you don't feel turned on. Exactly.
Or sometimes the other way around, though the first is more commonly discussed, especially for women, but it happens across genders. And the crucial takeaway here is... Genital response does not equal desire, and it definitely doesn't equal consent. Right.
You absolutely cannot assume someone wants sex just because their body is showing signs of arousal. Never. Communication is everything.
You have to rely on clear verbal consent, not physical cues. Which leads us nicely into talking about desire itself. Nagoski makes a distinction here, too, doesn't she? She does.
Between spontaneous desire and responsive desire. Spontaneous desire is kind of what we usually think of, right? That out-of-the-blue feeling of wanting sex. Yeah, that's the typical narrative.
I want sex, so let's get things started. But responsive desire is different. Right.
That's when the desire emerges after arousal has already begun. You start getting stimulated, maybe through touch or kissing. And then the feeling of wanting sex kicks in.
Exactly. It's more like, oh, this feels good. Now I want sex.
And the big message is that both are completely normal. Absolutely normal and valid. Responsive desire isn't broken or less legitimate.
It's just a different pathway. That seems incredibly important, especially given how much pressure there is, particularly on women, to always have that spontaneous drive ready to go. It's hugely validating for many people to hear that responsive desire is common and OK, and thinking about pathways.
The book also talks about orgasms, but maybe not in the way we usually expect. Yeah, she kind of de-centers the orgasm as the be-all and end-all goal. How so? Well, she talks about how varied orgasms are different for everyone, different even for the same person at different times.
OK. But more importantly, she argues for shifting the focus to overall pleasure and enjoyment throughout the experience. So pleasure becomes the main goal, not just the big O. Exactly.
Because sometimes focusing too hard on achieving orgasm can create pressure and anxiety, which, ironically, makes it harder to get there and enjoy the process. It activates the brakes. Ah, the brakes again, which brings us to stress.
Yes. Stress is a massive brake slammer. That whole fight-flight-freeze response system is fundamentally incompatible with sexual arousal.
Your body can't be ready to run from a tiger and relax into sexual pleasure at the same time. Pretty much. And chronic stress is particularly bad because it can keep those brakes constantly, like, half engaged.
Makes sense. Yeah. And our emotions in general play a big role, too.
Definitely. Anxiety, sadness, anger, they all tend to hit the brakes. Joy, excitement, feeling loved, they tend to release the brakes and hit the accelerator.
Attachment styles can influence this, too. So much of this seems internal, but Nagoski also talks about external influences, right? Cultural messages. Oh, absolutely.
She argues that a lot of the messages we get about sex from society, media, even sometimes medicine or religion, are just wrong. They set up unrealistic expectations. Like the idea that everyone should want sex all the time or desire should always be spontaneous? Exactly.
Or that sex has to look a certain way or that orgasm should always happen from penetration. These myths create a lot of shame and anxiety. And self-criticism, especially about our bodies, feeds right back into the brake system.
Big time. If you're busy worrying about how your stomach looks, you're not focusing on pleasurable sensations, you're activating your threat detection system, your brakes. So what's the antidote to all this pressure and self-criticism? A big part of it is mindfulness and self-compassion.
Mindfulness like paying attention to physical sensations? Yes. Focusing on what you're actually feeling right now without judging it. Just noticing the pleasure.
That can really enhance the experience. And self-compassion. Being kinder to yourself.
Exactly. Treating yourself with the same kindness you'd offer a friend if they were feeling inadequate or having sexual difficulties. It helps to release those brakes tied to shame and judgment.
The book seems to have some core principles then. Like embracing your uniqueness. Definitely.
Accepting that your sexuality is yours and it works the way it works. And finding joy in that. Are there any key quotes that really sum things up? There are a few good ones I like.
Your genitals are telling you something and you can trust them. Meaning pay attention to your body's responses even if they're confusing sometimes. Like the non-concordance thing.
Right. Trust the physical data even while remembering it doesn't automatically equal desire. And then there's pleasure is the measure.
Judging the experience by how good it feels. Not by whether you hit some external benchmark. Precisely.
It shifts the focus from performance to experience. And that simple one. You are normal.
Beautiful. Yeah. That one's powerful.
Just a direct validation of diverse bodies and diverse experiences. Everyone deserves to feel normal and okay about their sexuality. So boiling it down.
What are some practical things people could take away and maybe try? Well she suggests things like therapeutic masturbation basically. Exploring on your own to figure out what genuinely feels good to you. Self-discovery.
Makes sense. And practicing mindfulness like we said. Really tuning into sensations.
Open communication with partners is huge obviously. Talking about what feels good, what doesn't, what context works best for you. Exactly.
And remembering that responsive desire is perfectly fine. Taking that pressure off can make a big difference. And self-compassion.
Creating those low stress, high affection environments. All key ingredients for letting your sexual system work optimally. Now we should also touch on how the book's been received.
It's popular, but what do people say about it? Good? And perhaps less good? Overall, the praise is pretty overwhelming. People find it empowering, myth-busting, practical. The science backing is seen as a major plus and the body positive message really resonates.
Okay. Any comic criticisms? Some people find the writing style a bit... much. Nagoski uses a very conversational, sometimes informal tone.
For some, it's engaging. For others, it can feel a little bit patronizing or overly casual. Okay.
Style is always subjective. Anything else? A few critiques mention that it feels primarily aimed at heterosexual, monogamous women. Maybe not fully addressing the breadth of experiences.
And some readers felt certain points got repeated a bit. Fair enough. No book is perfect for everyone.
Right. But even with those points, the consensus seems to be that it's a really valuable resource. It sounds like, despite minor critiques, it's widely seen as a positive contribution, especially for women wanting to understand their sexuality better.
Definitely. It gives people a new framework, grounded in science, to understand themselves and potentially improve their sex lives and relationship with their bodies. So the core message is really about self-knowledge and self-acceptance, leading to better experiences.
That sums it up pretty well. Understanding the how and why can be incredibly freeing. It definitely gives you a lot to think about regarding your own experiences, doesn't it? What parts of this discussion resonated most, or what questions pop up for you? It certainly encourages that kind of personal reflection.
It's not just abstract science. It's about applying it to yourself. Well, if this book bite on Come As You Are gave you some food for thought, please consider subscribing to our channel.
And definitely leave us a five-star review if you found it insightful. We really do appreciate hearing what you think.